Quantitative Cybersecurity Risk Analysis Methodology
Guided Risk Assessment represents a paradigm shift from subjective risk matrices to quantitative, data-driven security analysis. By modeling your infrastructure as a probabilistic attack graph and applying advanced statistical methods, we calculate actual probabilities of successful attacks rather than relying on arbitrary "high/medium/low" ratings.
This approach enables objective prioritization of security investments based on measurable risk reduction and quantifiable return on investment.
| Aspect | Traditional Approach | Quantitative Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Calculation | Subjective ratings (1-5) | Probability distributions (0-1) |
| Likelihood Assessment | "High", "Medium", "Low" | Actual percentages (e.g., 34.7%) |
| Impact Measurement | Qualitative descriptions | Dollar amounts with confidence intervals |
| Prioritization | Based on opinion/intuition | Based on expected loss reduction |
| ROI Calculation | Subjective/impossible | Precise cost-benefit analysis |
| Repeatability | Varies by assessor | Consistent, reproducible |
Your network infrastructure is represented as a directed graph where nodes are systems/states and edges are attack transitions with associated probabilities based on vulnerability data, control effectiveness, and threat intelligence.
We use MCMC simulation to explore all possible attack paths through your infrastructure, calculating probability distributions for successful compromise of critical assets across thousands of simulated attack scenarios.
Dependencies between security controls, vulnerabilities, and attack vectors are modeled as Bayesian probability networks, allowing us to update risk estimates as conditions change.
Real-world attack data, vulnerability exploitability scores (CVSS, EPSS), and threat actor behavior patterns inform probability assignments, ensuring models reflect actual risk.
Historical breach costs, regulatory penalties, business interruption impacts, and recovery expenses are quantified with confidence intervals based on industry data and organizational context.
Security controls are modeled by their actual reduction in attack success probability, measured through penetration testing, breach data, and vendor validation studies.
Scenario: Risk of database compromise via web application
Risk = 0.15 × 0.40 × 0.65 × $2,400,000 = $93,600 annual expected loss
Adding MFA: Reduces P(lateral movement) to 0.10 → New risk = $23,400 → Saves $70,200/year (MFA cost $15K/year = 368% ROI)
This methodology is currently under development. Express your interest to be notified when beta testing begins.